Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)

9.4 Ongoing costs for sequestration projects

The business case: costs of establishing and running a project

The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability

Explore the full Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)

 
The permanence rules for the CFI required that the carbon stocks in sequestration projects be retained for 100 years. The ERF has introduced an optional permanence period of 25 years; however, a project proponent using the 25-year period will receive 20% fewer ACCUs. This means that there is a potential for ongoing costs even after the crediting periods for the project are completed.
The permanence obligation has a number of broad implications for costs:
  • In the normal course of events (if sequestration is successful and undisturbed), after the end of the crediting period the obligation to maintain the carbon stores will remain until the end of the permanence period. If the permanence period has not yet finished, selling the land may require transferring the sequestration project to the new landowner (who will need to become the project proponent and a recognised offsets entity). At the very least, this increases transaction costs for the sale. The seller and buyer both have responsibilities:
    • The seller of the land containing the project must ensure that any agent or prospective buyer is fully informed of the permanence obligation.
    • The buyer of the land needs to inform himself or herself about the sequestration project, including by reviewing records, understanding the methodology and checking with the register of offsets projects.
  • Alternatively, the sequestration project can be cancelled at any time. This would require the relinquishment (return) of the ACCUs earned under the project (or the purchase of replacement ACCUs if the original ACCUs have already been sold).
  • If something goes wrong during the sequestration project and carbon stores are depleted, the project proponent (which may or may not be the landowner) must take reasonable steps to restore the carbon stores. If they are unable to do so, they may have to relinquish ACCUs to the regulator.
  • If the project proponent (which may or may not be the landowner) does not relinquish ACCUs as required, the regulator may impose a carbon maintenance obligation on the land. This attaches to the title of the land and imposes obligations on current and future landowners (regardless of whether they were the original project proponent):
    • A carbon maintenance obligation seeks to prevent the landowner from engaging in conduct that results, or is likely to result, in a reduction in carbon stores below the benchmark sequestration level, unless the conduct relates to an activity that is expressly permitted under the carbon maintenance obligation.
    • The benchmark level is the amount of carbon sequestered in the relevant area or areas at the time that the carbon maintenance obligation was made.

 

 

Explore the full Workshop Manual: The business case for carbon farming: improving your farm’s sustainability (January 2021)

Read the report

RESEARCH REPORTS

1. Introduction: background to the business case

This chapter lays out the basic background and groundwork of the manual

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.1 Overview

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.2 Being clear about the reasons for participating

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.3 Key steps in a decision process

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.4 Working through the business case for carbon farming

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.5 Factors determining project economics

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.6 Elements of the business case

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.7 Building an economic case

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.8 Important features of the business case

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

1.9 The plan of this manual

Introduction: background to the business case

RESEARCH REPORTS

2. How carbon is farmed under the ERF

This chapter considers in detail the activities that constitute carbon farming

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.1 The scope of carbon farming under the ERF

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.2 Emissions avoidance activities

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.3 Sequestration activities

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.4 The negative list

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.5 Carbon farming under the Emissions Reduction Fund

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

2.6 Who's who in the CFI and the ERF

How carbon is farmed under the ERF

RESEARCH REPORTS

3. The policy context and the price of ACCUs

This chapter takes a broad look at the policy context for carbon farming

RESEARCH REPORTS

3.1 The policy context

The policy context and the price of ACCUs

RESEARCH REPORTS

3.2 A documented climate challenge…

The policy context and the price of ACCUs

RESEARCH REPORTS

3.3 … with numerous policy responses

The policy context and the price of ACCUs

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the farming sector, brought to you by the Kondinin team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the farming sector, brought to you by the Kondinin team.

editions

Research Report: Sheep Yards (April 2025)

This month's Research Report includes more than a dozen case studies of new sheep yard builds and renovations from around the country. There are plenty of ideas to make the handling of stock more efficient and stress-free.

editions

Research Report: Large Square Baler Testing (March 2025)

This month Kondinin Group has capacity tested four high-density, large square balers in what is believed to be a first for Australia. Balers from Krone, Kuhn, Massey Ferguson and New Holland were put through their paces, working in windrowed straw.

editions

Research Report: Rural Communications (February 2025)

With the departure of 3G technology and the emergence of 5G and satellite options, there are significant changes on the connectivity horizon. This month Kondinin Group engineers Ben White and Josh Giumelli investigate what is the best way to stay connected in regional and remote areas.

editions

Research Report: Chaser Bins (January 2025)

Chaser bins play a vital role when it comes to on-farm grain logistics. The January Research Report features a comprehensive round up of the latest chaser bins of 30 tonnes-plus capacity.